Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
[ send me this paper ]
A 1 page brief of the case involving the police detainment and questioning of four defendants without advising them of their right to silence or their right to an attorney. Determined that such interrogation did not adequately provide for the Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination, the “right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will”. No additional sources are listed.
Filename: PPlawBr5.wps
Essay Title: Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Just in all Cases?
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page exploration of this critical case. The author contends that the overall good that is accomplished by the Miranda requirement outweighs the fact that occasionally criminals escape prosecution because they were not read their rights at the time of apprehension and arrest. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: PPlwMir2.rtf
Essay Title: Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Just in all Cases?

Modern Law and the Case of Ruxley Electronics;
[ send me this paper ]
This 6 page paper considers the case of Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth in the context of its' precedent being representative of modern law. The case is examined in the context its' interpretation of the award of damages being granted in line with a pleasurable contract and limited in terms of the damages awarded despite the breach of express condition. The paper cites many cases to illustrate the points raised. The bibliography cites 10 sources.
Filename: TEruxley.wps
Essay Title: Modern Law and the Case of Ruxley Electronics;

Monsanto Co. v. Coramandal Indag Products, (P) Ltd (Legal Brief)
[ send me this paper ]
This 4 page paper examines this international business case. Several sections make up this brief and provides details about the case and its relevance. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: SA537brf.rtf
Essay Title: Monsanto Co. v. Coramandal Indag Products, (P) Ltd (Legal Brief)

Morgan’s Home v. Martucci, et al
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page case summary of Morgan’s Home Equipment Corp. v. John Martucci, Harry Garber, Ray Convor and Dan Spiller and also Morris Spiller, individually and trading as Variety Sales Corp (390 Pa. 618, 136 A.2d 838). The writer summarizes the facts of the case, its legal history, the court holding, rational and disposition. No other sources cited.
Filename: khmvmar.rtf
Essay Title: Morgan’s Home v. Martucci, et al

Moylan v. Estes
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page case summary of a case in which the question before the court is whether or not two parties can legally renegotiate a land sale without paying a commission to the real estate broker to brought them together. The write summarizes the facts of the case, the procedural history, the holding, and the court’s rationale. No bibliography is provided.
Filename: khmve.rtf
Essay Title: Moylan v. Estes

New Jersey State Law: A Case Study
[ send me this paper ]
9 pages in length. In this interesting case study about Barkin's Beef and Brew, questions are raised as to who is responsible when a patron consumes too much alcohol and then leaves the premises and is charged with fighting and cutting a man with a knife. This is intended as a legal brief being presented to the student's legal firm in which the firm is presenting the client who was attacked at knifepoint by the drunken man. By raising the appropriate legal questions and comparing them to New Jersey State Statutes, it is intended to arrive at a satisfactory answer within the confines of legality in the New Jersey legal system. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Filename: JGAnjstl.wps
Essay Title: New Jersey State Law: A Case Study